Texas Democratic primary

March 1, 2016

Last updated Mar. 22, 4:20 PM EDT

100% precincts reporting (1,433,908 votes total)

Candidate	Percent	Votes
Hillary Clinton	65.2%	935,080 votes
Bernie Sanders	33.2%	475,561 votes
Martin O'Malleysuspended campaign Feb. 1	0.4%	5,337 votes
Others	1.3%	17,930 votes

County by county results

County Precincts reporting	Clinton Votes	Sanders	Others
Anderson 23 of 23	75.6% 994	22.7% 299	1.7% 22
Andrews 5 of 5	66.1% 76	33.0% 38	0.9% 1
Angelina 43 of 43	73.7% 1,950	23.5% 622	2.8% 74
Aransas 5 of 5	63.0% 488	35.1% 272	1.8% 14
Archer 12 of 12	58.9% 99	38.1% 64	3.0% 5
Armstrong 11 of 11	20.0% 1	80.0% 4	0% 0
Atascosa 24 of 24	71.7% 1,355	25.3% 478	3.0% 57
Austin 18 of 18	73.4% 492	24.6% 165	1.9% 13
Bailey 5 of 5	71.2% 84	24.6% 29	4.2% 5
Bandera 11 of 11	55.5% 378	43.0% 293	1.5% 10
Bastrop 21 of 21	59.1% 2,894	39.7% 1,945	1.2% 60
Baylor 5 of 5	61.3% 46	32.0% 24	6.7% 5
Bee 18 of 18	75.1% 1,132	21.2% 320	3.7% 56
Bell 49 of 49	69.9% 7,416	29.0% 3,079	1.0% 110
Bexar 718 of 718	66.8% 76,502	32.1% 36,720	1.1% 1,241
Blanco 5 of 5	54.7% 229	45.3% 190	0% 0
Borden 2 of 2	80.0% 4	20.0% 1	0% 0
Bosque 12 of 12	62.6% 353	35.3% 199	2.1% 12
Bowie 19 of 19	76.1% 2,436	21.4% 687	2.5% 80
Brazoria 33 of 33	69.6% 8,996	28.8% 3,720	1.6% 212
Brazos 27 of 27	49.1% 3,559	49.4% 3,580	1.5% 107
Brewster 9 of 9	43.6% 699	48.1% 771	8.2% 132
Briscoe 5 of 5	57.1% 16	39.3% 11	3.6% 1
Brooks 6 of 6	74.4% 1,603	16.8% 362	8.9% 191
Brown 19 of 19	58.5% 319	38.9% 212	2.6% 14
Burleson 14 of 14	74.0% 469	23.5% 149	2.5% 16
Burnet 21 of 21	59.4% 871	39.3% 576	1.3% 19
Caldwell 18 of 18	65.2% 1,657	32.7% 831	2.1% 54
Calhoun 26 of 26	67.5% 1,024	28.0% 425	4.5% 68
Callahan 7 of 7	44.1% 86	53.3% 104	2.6% 5
Cameron 72 of 72	68.2% 20,326	27.9% 8,318	3.9% 1,155
Camp 5 of 5	76.6% 484	21.2% 134	2.2% 14
Carson 2 of 2	62.5% 50	37.5% 30	0% 0
Cass 18 of 18	73.1% 777	24.8% 264	2.1% 22
Castro 9 of 9	73.8% 127	23.3% 40	2.9% 5
Chambers 14 of 14	68.0% 687	29.0% 293	3.1% 31
Cherokee 25 of 25	74.2% 989	24.2% 323	1.6% 21
Childress 5 of 5	58.7% 54	37.0% 34	4.3% 4
Clay 17 of 17	62.8% 120	33.5% 64	3.7% 7
Cochran 5 of 5	50.0% 4	37.5% 3	12.5% 1
Coke 5 of 5	48.1% 25	48.1% 25	3.8% 2
Coleman 6 of 6	60.0% 75	39.2% 49	0.8% 1
Collin 64 of 64	59.2% 23,591	40.3% 16,082	0.5% 192
Collingsworth 2 of 2	59.0% 36	39.3% 24	1.6% 1
Colorado 13 of 13	74.8% 474	23.7% 150	1.6% 10
Comal 24 of 24	60.0% 3,109	39.0% 2,023	1.0% 50
Comanche 15 of 15	63.3% 217	33.8% 116	2.9% 10
Concho 2 of 2	69.2% 27	28.2% 11	2.6% 1
Cooke 31 of 31	56.4% 449	42.0% 334	1.6% 13
Coryell 11 of 11	62.7% 1,010	35.8% 577	1.6% 25
Cottle 6 of 6	56.5% 26	39.1% 18	4.3% 2
Crane 5 of 5	66.0% 62	25.5% 24	8.5% 8
Crockett 5 of 5	37.7% 266	34.0% 240	28.2% 199
Crosby 5 of 5	58.2% 131	40.4% 91	1.3% 3
Culberson 3 of 3	62.0% 355	27.9% 160	10.1% 58
Dallam 5 of 5	61.5% 24	33.3% 13	5.1% 2
Dallas 798 of 798	71.5% 113,574	27.8% 44,231	0.7% 1,147
Dawson 5 of 5	70.2% 92	26.0% 34	3.8% 5
Deaf Smith 5 of 5	67.8% 200	29.2% 86	3.1% 9
Delta 8 of 8	67.9% 110	31.5% 51	0.6% 1
Denton 159 of 159	50.8% 16,470	48.5% 15,750	0.7% 233
De Witt 11 of 11	70.3% 293	27.1% 113	2.6% 11
Dickens 6 of 6	52.0% 13	44.0% 11	4.0% 1
Dimmit 8 of 8	68.9% 1,804	20.4% 534	10.7% 281
Donley 3 of 3	47.8% 33	50.7% 35	1.4% 1
Duval 10 of 10	76.2% 2,272	17.5% 523	6.3% 187
Eastland 10 of 10	55.7% 171	39.7% 122	4.6% 14
Ector 28 of 28	64.9% 1,852	33.0% 941	2.1% 60
Edwards 5 of 5	57.5% 42	37.0% 27	5.5% 4
Ellis 50 of 50	69.5% 3,719	29.2% 1,563	1.3% 69
El Paso 192 of 192	66.0% 36,067	31.5% 17,176	2.5% 1,367
Erath 11 of 11	52.5% 427	44.9% 365	2.6% 21
Falls 14 of 14	81.4% 551	17.0% 115	1.6% 11
Fannin 17 of 17	63.0% 505	34.6% 277	2.4% 19
Fayette 27 of 27	63.9% 584	33.8% 309	2.3% 21
Fisher 5 of 5	53.3% 226	34.4% 146	12.3% 52
Floyd 3 of 3	65.9% 60	26.4% 24	7.7% 7
Foard 5 of 5	34.3% 80	48.1% 112	17.6% 41
Fort Bend 80 of 80	74.6% 29,248	24.9% 9,765	0.4% 173
Franklin 9 of 9	67.6% 163	30.3% 73	2.1% 5
Freestone 16 of 16	76.8% 380	20.6% 102	2.6% 13
Frio 10 of 10	67.7% 1,864	22.9% 630	9.4% 258
Gaines 5 of 5	55.8% 91	36.2% 59	8.0% 13
Galveston 35 of 35	68.2% 9,435	30.6% 4,233	1.2% 171
Garza 7 of 7	56.5% 35	35.5% 22	8.1% 5
Gillespie 12 of 12	71.9% 813	27.8% 314	0.3% 3
Glasscock 5 of 5	50.0% 4	50.0% 4	0% 0
Goliad 10 of 10	66.4% 389	25.8% 151	7.8% 46
Gonzales 14 of 14	72.3% 368	25.3% 129	2.4% 12
Gray 8 of 8	53.9% 111	41.7% 86	4.4% 9
Grayson 24 of 24	52.8% 1,940	45.9% 1,687	1.3% 46
Gregg 22 of 22	78.1% 3,411	20.7% 906	1.2% 51
Grimes 15 of 15	73.1% 583	25.2% 201	1.6% 13
Guadalupe 70 of 70	64.0% 3,787	34.8% 2,061	1.2% 73
Hale 31 of 31	60.3% 312	34.0% 176	5.6% 29
Hall 8 of 8	64.3% 63	28.6% 28	7.1% 7
Hamilton 5 of 5	56.5% 118	40.2% 84	3.3% 7
Hansford 3 of 3	58.3% 21	33.3% 12	8.3% 3
Hardeman 5 of 5	39.4% 71	48.9% 88	11.7% 21
Hardin 20 of 20	59.5% 625	37.9% 398	2.6% 27
Harris 1013 of 1013	70.5% 156,729	28.5% 63,246	1.0% 2,265
Harrison 27 of 27	78.8% 2,043	20.4% 528	0.8% 21
Hartley 7 of 7	55.8% 29	36.5% 19	7.7% 4
Haskell 11 of 11	58.7% 159	34.3% 93	7.0% 19
Hays 50 of 50	46.9% 6,625	51.8% 7,311	1.3% 177
Hemphill 9 of 9	65.2% 15	34.8% 8	0% 0
Henderson 28 of 28	71.6% 1,593	26.9% 598	1.6% 35
Hidalgo 256 of 256	69.1% 40,276	27.3% 15,894	3.7% 2,150
Hill 23 of 23	69.1% 718	28.6% 297	2.3% 24
Hockley 2 of 2	58.3% 183	36.9% 116	4.8% 15
Hood 11 of 11	62.6% 928	35.6% 527	1.8% 27
Hopkins 15 of 15	66.8% 628	31.7% 298	1.5% 14
Houston 22 of 22	80.0% 464	17.4% 101	2.6% 15
Howard 13 of 13	63.5% 350	34.7% 191	1.8% 10
Hudspeth 5 of 5	53.8% 147	35.5% 97	10.6% 29
Hunt 35 of 35	60.5% 1,328	38.6% 847	0.9% 20
Hutchinson 9 of 9	56.5% 153	38.0% 103	5.5% 15
Irion 5 of 5	65.1% 28	32.6% 14	2.3% 1
Jack 7 of 7	62.1% 87	32.9% 46	5.0% 7
Jackson 10 of 10	70.6% 266	24.9% 94	4.5% 17
Jasper 21 of 21	75.6% 932	21.9% 270	2.4% 30
Jeff Davis 6 of 6	49.6% 140	46.8% 132	3.5% 10
Jefferson 41 of 41	76.9% 16,580	20.6% 4,440	2.5% 532
Jim Hogg 6 of 6	75.0% 1,421	18.8% 356	6.2% 117
Jim Wells 22 of 22	71.6% 4,688	21.9% 1,436	6.4% 420
Johnson 37 of 37	58.5% 2,270	40.3% 1,565	1.1% 44
Jones 12 of 12	63.4% 173	34.4% 94	2.2% 6
Karnes 16 of 16	52.8% 719	35.0% 476	12.2% 166
Kaufman 31 of 31	69.7% 2,229	29.6% 946	0.7% 23
Kendall 12 of 12	56.2% 641	43.0% 491	0.8% 9
Kenedy 7 of 7	59.4% 63	30.2% 32	10.4% 11
Kent 7 of 7	36.7% 22	46.7% 28	16.7% 10
Kerr 21 of 21	58.4% 1,016	40.6% 707	1.0% 18
Kimble 8 of 8	44.6% 29	52.3% 34	3.1% 2
King 5 of 5	66.7% 2	33.3% 1	0% 0
Kinney 5 of 5	60.8% 211	30.8% 107	8.4% 29
Kleberg 15 of 15	70.7% 1,738	25.6% 630	3.7% 90
Knox 7 of 7	71.6% 68	17.9% 17	10.5% 10
Lamar 33 of 33	69.3% 923	29.1% 388	1.6% 21
Lampasas 6 of 6	60.0% 324	38.0% 205	2.0% 11
La Salle 7 of 7	70.1% 557	19.6% 156	10.3% 82
La Vaca 10 of 10	68.5% 322	29.1% 137	2.3% 11
Lee 11 of 11	65.6% 366	32.1% 179	2.3% 13
Leon 18 of 18	74.3% 289	22.9% 89	2.8% 11
Liberty 31 of 31	71.5% 1,041	26.0% 378	2.5% 37
Limestone 22 of 22	79.1% 592	19.3% 144	1.6% 12
Lipscomb 8 of 8	64.7% 22	32.4% 11	2.9% 1
Live Oak 15 of 15	67.7% 203	24.0% 72	8.3% 25
Llano 10 of 10	64.5% 512	33.6% 267	1.9% 15
Loving 5 of 5	25.0% 3	41.7% 5	33.3% 4
Lubbock 39 of 39	57.4% 5,767	40.9% 4,112	1.6% 165
Lynn 11 of 11	58.3% 14	41.7% 10	0% 0
Madison 7 of 7	75.4% 227	22.9% 69	1.7% 5
Marion 11 of 11	76.1% 421	22.2% 123	1.6% 9
Martin 7 of 7	59.0% 36	27.9% 17	13.1% 8
Mason 5 of 5	62.7% 89	35.2% 50	2.1% 3
Matagorda 19 of 19	74.2% 1,088	23.4% 344	2.4% 35
Maverick 15 of 15	69.5% 4,342	24.2% 1,508	6.3% 394
McCulloch 10 of 10	66.4% 93	30.7% 43	2.9% 4
McLennan 33 of 33	67.0% 5,531	31.9% 2,633	1.2% 97
McMullen 5 of 5	80.0% 4	20.0% 1	0% 0
Medina 15 of 15	69.8% 1,070	28.4% 435	1.9% 29
Menard 7 of 7	56.1% 23	39.0% 16	4.9% 2
Midland 17 of 17	63.0% 1,551	34.6% 852	2.3% 57
Milam 9 of 9	67.8% 577	29.6% 252	2.6% 22
Mills 11 of 11	53.2% 50	43.6% 41	3.2% 3
Mitchell 7 of 7	74.1% 109	21.1% 31	4.8% 7
Montague 11 of 11	54.3% 153	43.3% 122	2.5% 7
Montgomery 91 of 91	59.5% 7,540	39.8% 5,040	0.8% 97
Moore 8 of 8	59.8% 149	32.5% 81	7.6% 19
Morris 8 of 8	73.3% 461	22.9% 144	3.8% 24
Motley 7 of 7	68.4% 13	31.6% 6	0% 0
Nacogdoches 18 of 18	65.2% 1,597	33.8% 827	1.0% 25
Navarro 21 of 21	72.5% 955	25.3% 333	2.3% 30
Newton 23 of 23	46.2% 605	40.4% 529	13.4% 175
Nueces 128 of 128	70.5% 15,662	27.8% 6,172	1.7% 388
Ochiltree 5 of 5	53.0% 35	43.9% 29	3.0% 2
Oldham 2 of 2	68.8% 11	25.0% 4	6.3% 1
Orange 35 of 35	68.1% 1,852	30.0% 816	1.9% 53
Palo Pinto 14 of 14	59.5% 361	37.9% 230	2.6% 16
Panola 20 of 20	80.1% 559	18.6% 130	1.3% 9
Parker 42 of 42	54.5% 1,800	44.6% 1,474	0.9% 31
Parmer 10 of 10	72.6% 82	23.0% 26	4.4% 5
Pecos 9 of 9	55.4% 816	33.2% 488	11.4% 168
Polk 22 of 22	71.3% 859	26.7% 322	2.0% 24
Potter 17 of 17	56.6% 1,490	41.4% 1,091	2.0% 52
Presidio 8 of 8	57.4% 776	33.1% 447	9.5% 129
Rains 9 of 9	64.3% 173	33.1% 89	2.6% 7
Randall 15 of 15	51.1% 1,586	47.6% 1,479	1.3% 39
Reagan 5 of 5	63.2% 12	36.8% 7	0% 0
Real 3 of 3	53.8% 28	44.2% 23	1.9% 1
Red River 11 of 11	79.0% 377	18.2% 87	2.7% 13
Reeves 7 of 7	59.6% 1,128	29.7% 563	10.7% 202
Refugio 11 of 11	64.2% 549	29.6% 253	6.2% 53
Roberts 5 of 5	60.0% 3	40.0% 2	0% 0
Robertson 15 of 15	70.9% 893	23.0% 289	6.1% 77
Rockwall 18 of 18	59.6% 1,722	35.9% 1,038	4.4% 128
Runnels 11 of 11	57.6% 80	39.6% 55	2.9% 4
Rusk 18 of 18	78.1% 1,114	19.4% 276	2.5% 36
Sabine 9 of 9	66.4% 192	28.4% 82	5.2% 15
San Augustine 12 of 12	83.0% 366	14.1% 62	2.9% 13
San Jacinto 11 of 11	72.0% 561	24.8% 193	3.2% 25
San Patricio 26 of 26	73.2% 2,633	23.6% 849	3.3% 117
San Saba 2 of 2	67.4% 58	31.4% 27	1.2% 1
Schleicher 5 of 5	64.4% 58	26.7% 24	8.9% 8
Scurry 12 of 12	61.6% 154	34.0% 85	4.4% 11
Shackelford 8 of 8	50.0% 15	46.7% 14	3.3% 1
Shelby 9 of 9	77.8% 346	20.2% 90	2.0% 9
Sherman 8 of 8	61.3% 19	25.8% 8	12.9% 4
Smith 35 of 35	73.6% 5,752	25.4% 1,984	1.0% 80
Somervell 5 of 5	50.8% 66	48.5% 63	0.8% 1
Starr 11 of 11	77.8% 6,918	18.3% 1,631	3.9% 346
Stephens 6 of 6	55.6% 45	43.2% 35	1.2% 1
Sterling 5 of 5	50.0% 5	40.0% 4	10.0% 1
Stonewall 5 of 5	57.8% 59	35.3% 36	6.9% 7
Sutton 5 of 5	69.2% 27	25.6% 10	5.1% 2
Swisher 5 of 5	60.5% 141	33.5% 78	6.0% 14
Tarrant 695 of 695	65.1% 67,590	34.2% 35,507	0.6% 654
Taylor 21 of 21	54.6% 1,789	43.4% 1,421	2.0% 64
Terrell 5 of 5	43.5% 67	41.6% 64	14.9% 23
Terry 8 of 8	59.0% 141	34.7% 83	6.3% 15
Throckmorton 6 of 6	61.9% 26	38.1% 16	0% 0
Titus 20 of 20	70.1% 475	25.8% 175	4.1% 28
Tom Green 21 of 21	55.9% 1,650	41.8% 1,234	2.2% 66
Travis 248 of 248	48.2% 69,314	51.4% 73,889	0.4% 629
Trinity 21 of 21	71.8% 333	25.2% 117	3.0% 14
Tyler 17 of 17	74.3% 453	22.8% 139	3.0% 18
Upshur 21 of 21	71.7% 725	26.6% 269	1.7% 17
Upton 7 of 7	55.8% 91	27.6% 45	16.6% 27
Uvalde 15 of 15	63.3% 1,740	27.7% 762	9.0% 247
Val Verde 18 of 18	65.7% 1,777	28.4% 768	5.8% 158
Van Zandt 19 of 19	64.1% 722	33.5% 377	2.4% 27
Victoria 36 of 36	64.5% 2,205	32.7% 1,118	2.8% 97
Walker 17 of 17	61.3% 1,290	37.4% 788	1.3% 27
Waller 21 of 21	67.5% 1,221	30.8% 557	1.7% 31
Ward 9 of 9	62.2% 306	29.9% 147	7.9% 39
Washington 22 of 22	73.1% 781	25.7% 275	1.1% 12
Webb 69 of 69	71.9% 18,559	23.9% 6,177	4.2% 1,090
Wharton 9 of 9	78.6% 960	18.2% 223	3.2% 39
Wheeler 11 of 11	59.7% 37	37.1% 23	3.2% 2
Wichita 32 of 32	55.2% 1,958	43.5% 1,544	1.4% 48
Wilbarger 7 of 7	61.5% 136	33.9% 75	4.5% 10
Willacy 12 of 12	70.1% 2,072	22.2% 657	7.7% 228
Williamson 64 of 64	52.7% 16,374	46.7% 14,501	0.6% 191
Wilson 17 of 17	71.4% 1,280	26.8% 481	1.7% 31
Winkler 6 of 6	69.8% 30	25.6% 11	4.7% 2
Wise 26 of 26	56.2% 750	41.8% 557	2.0% 27
Wood 12 of 12	68.7% 660	29.6% 284	1.8% 17
Yoakum 2 of 2	42.9% 9	47.6% 10	9.5% 2
Young 7 of 7	58.6% 198	38.8% 131	2.7% 9
Zapata 8 of 8	67.8% 1,969	23.6% 685	8.5% 248
Zavala 7 of 7	75.5% 1,557	18.1% 373	6.4% 132
Lamb 11 of 11	53.3% 172	26.9% 87	19.8% 64
Nolan 10 of 10	65.5% 270	29.6% 122	4.9% 20

Note: AP does not report county or town level results for this race.